Greenpeace : Amazing new technology cuts CO2 emissions 99.5%

This new technology converts gases from industries burning fossil fuels into energy. Very cheap, visit www.absalutecology.com for more details.
The technology makes burning coal, oil, rubbish with nearly 0% pollution possible. Recycling has never been a more profitable and environmentaly friendly possiblilty then it is now. Spread the news and avoid a nuclear future. Not excatly sustainable living, but at least we’ll avoid the worst of climate change if we act soon. This technology cleans toxic gasses of impurities such as CO2, SO2, Nitrogen gas, and dust particles. Keeping the air clean at a very low cost.

This video is not directly supported by greenpeace, although its aim is to provide a simlar service as greenpeace, to protect the environment while accomodating the needs of human expansion and growth.

Absalutecology: Creating a solution to the global environmental and economic problem of air pollution.

Webby: http://www.absalutecology.com/

Duration : 0:9:48


[youtube aenx0d4Avqw]

25 Responses to “Greenpeace : Amazing new technology cuts CO2 emissions 99.5%”

  1. Why haven’t we …
    Why haven’t we heard of this in America? I rarely see any green options in the daily media. Guess I should have thrown my tv out a long time ago…
    btw Tetekofa what kind of oxygen emissions are you worried about? From what I’ve heard, our oxygen output is radically dropping.

  2. jamesrobertdobbs on July 19th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    Kazakhstan greatest …
    Kazakhstan greatest country in world!

  3. - ‘”what about the …
    - ‘”what about the oxygen emissions?

  4. hate to say this, …
    hate to say this, but co2, even when its blown up in a storm, comes back down, look it up

  5. Really??!! So there …
    Really??!! So there must be no dust, sand, heavy metals in the air you say. Ever heard of storms , winds and such stuff. Volcanoes erupt??? Have you ever been to school: primary, secondary…? You have thousands of documentaries to watch to catch up with the rest of the world. Friendly suggestion: start right away.

  6. Don¨’t insult but …
    Don¨’t insult but rather put an argument to the discussion, otherwise this utterly uninformed 41 year old told you off with every right. Your lack in manners lost you this discussion. Shame to lose to less knowledgeable opponent.

  7. Yeah, kid needs …
    Yeah, kid needs some manners but you lack education :(

  8. Are you for real??? …
    Are you for real??? We are about to cook whole Earth. Hope you like it hot! If you are really 41 you should get informed as you obviously stopped reading and learning long time ago :O

  9. kid, two words, ” …
    kid, two words, “GROW” “UP”,

  10. thank you …
    thank you GreenpeaceUk for clarifying that up, but i would also like to add to my statement that gases heaver than air do not rise, therefore can not, and do not magically go floating up into the atmo

  11. Youre an idiot…
    Youre an idiot…

  12. Just want to make …
    Just want to make clear that this video is nothing to do with Greenpeace. We have not reviewed and are not aware of this technology, and so cannot endorse it. To avoid any confusion we have contacted the company to request that Greenpeace’s name is removed from any publicity claims relating to this product…

  13. thats true,but it …
    thats true,but it is also true that carbon emmissions have increased dramatically over the last century, which is also not good in respect to he greenhouse effect

  14. my god people,are …
    my god people,are you guys nutz, carbon emisitions are good for the earth, what do you think plants live on CO2, cut that down, and plants die, then , no plants, no air, no air, no mankind, my god, i cant believe you people are buying into this co2 B.S. co2 is part of nature, and if you believe mankind is responsible for its down fall your fooling yourself.

  15. mrmultidextrous on July 19th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    You can believe …
    You can believe whatever you want, but burning 8 billion metric tons of carbon a year is increasing CO2 in the air by about 3 ppm a year, and will increase as the ocean’s ability to buffer CO2 decreases with increasing ocean temperature and increasing ocean acidity.

  16. Plants take in CO2 …
    Plants take in CO2 to support all life on Earth. Since 2005, temperatures have gone down globally, as CO2 emisisons, and life on Earth, have gone up.

  17. IWantToPlayAGame314 on July 19th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    which covers around …
    which covers around four fifths of the Earths surface. Many scientists agree that global warming/climate change etc. cannot be stopped as human activity makes up such a small fraction of pollutants in the atmosphere.

  18. IWantToPlayAGame314 on July 19th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    I believe that the …
    I believe that the emissions that are generated from factories and warehouses etc. make up a small fraction of the carbon dioxide (CO2) and environmentally-harmful gases that is in the atmosphere today (within 2-3%). The majority of the amount of harmful gases is from nature itself. The two main constituents are decaying vegetation, which creates carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). The same gases are made by the vast oceans, through their expansion in heat and other scientific phenomena,

  19. why do you use …
    why do you use greenpeace name?

  20. i want to say that …
    i want to say that if such invention is found we should spread it quickly in order t SAVE THE PLANET !!! i belive in humanity ps could please sb explain in plain words how far exactly from destruction?

  21. humanrightstruth on July 19th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    To learn more about …
    To learn more about WORLDBANK plans =
    google search YouTube video :
    “PROTEST-Indigenous Peoples “2nd MAY REVOLT” at the UN”

  22. Now put The …
    Now put The Technology Into Cars And We Found Our Answer… IF The Technology Exist, Works And True….

    That Country Economy Will Blow Up Cause oF That.

  23. What you are …
    What you are describing is a perpetual motion engine. If it were real it would break the laws of thermodynamics. You can’t get more energy out than you put in. Splitting CO2 into carbon and oxygen will consume no less energy than you can get by recombining them. Ie: burn the carbon and you’re back where you started in terms of CO2.

    Filtering the flue gases is a good thing, but you can’t make energy out of it.

  24. Holy F**k …… I …
    Holy F**k …… I mean really HOLY HOLY f**K, thats is an Amazing invention

  25. lolol borat is so …
    lolol borat is so funny

Leave a Reply